ok... let me start me start by saying while the review i just read may have factors that are true, the writers judgement is incredibly biased. Ok obviously COD and Battlefield have grabbed the military shooters scene, or as the writer puts it "took over the world" His break down of what is clearly .. lets say anal attention to details is unjust. Battlefield 3 was a good game and the campiegn was well written... it was like playin a movie about soldiers as GR:FS is the opposite. This is a game about soldiers and the cinematic "breaches" are amazing. i feel in complete control and would never compare it to something as tedious as COD. Ill pass on the zombie maps and the hype thanks. Ghost Recon is back. Buckkle up biotches the future is now!