User Reviews - All Comments

re: not bad

GamerLagger — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:35:59 GMT

I believe that this was an advancement in the installment of the call of duty franchise. I think that Treyarch was a great help in the making of this game. The online gaming function still leaves a lot to be desired but otherwise it was an all right online system. It works much better than MGS online. The part I thought that GI didn't include nearly enough of was the horror genre mode: Nazi Zombie. Although it was a extremely poorly built map environment. The need to communicate to the online players while playing is crucial in order to make to higher rounds. So over all in my review the story was stellar, the online is all right (again better than MGS's online mode) and the horror installment to the series made me waiting for the next move Treyarch will pull in Black Ops. So overall i give it four stars. ****

re: World at War, or is it?

Colton — Sun, 16 May 2010 00:39:52 GMT

"depending on who you pay with..."

I usually think it matters more about who you play with than who you pay with... I know Visa is better than MasterCard and all, but I doubt it'll make you better at World at War. ;)

just kidding bro, and if I were you I'd stick to zombies and focus your multiplayer needs on MW2 or BC2. Good luck dude.

re: World at War, or is it?

Daniel Lindberg — Sun, 16 May 2010 00:32:27 GMT

Even though I haven't played this game since MW2 came out, I still hate those MP40 noobs.

re: not bad

redbob2400 — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:57:56 GMT

me too

re: Best Game Ever for Xbox 360

MetalHead94 — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:51:24 GMT

Dude bbc2 is garbage :(

re: Best Game Ever for Xbox 360

Breaker — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:45:48 GMT

Modern Warfare 2 took World at War and Modern Warfare 1 and made them better. Then Bad Company 2 came along and threw them down the dirty laundry chute.

re: World at War Plunder

Mr_Mojo-Risin__ — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:18:06 GMT

i shouldnt even have to explain how Nazi Zombies blows

re: World at War Plunder

C.K. — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 03:12:31 GMT

How do you not love Nazi Zombehs?? 0^o;

re: World at War Plunder

Mr_Mojo-Risin__ — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 02:43:11 GMT

and the grahics suck

re: World at War Plunder

Mr_Mojo-Risin__ — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 08:34:32 GMT

the Campaign is pathetic, but so is the one in Modern Warfare 2, I am disappointing by Call Of Duty, I had high expectations after COD 4.

re: World at War Plunder

Joe Likes Pie — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:04:10 GMT

This is not the worst installment in the series. Just because it isn't as good as Modern Warfare 2 does not mean it sucks. There are not many glitches in the multiplayer, either.

re: World at War Plunder

Bazz27 — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:52:28 GMT

THe story "boring"? It was very amazing, plenty of epic moments, definatley one of the best WWII games made. More than just graphically and story impressive the weapons are realistic, fun to fire, and it truly captures the darker side of war

re: World at War Plunder

trombonehero96 — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:49:39 GMT

I enjoyed this game, even though the campaign paled in comparison to MW2. Online is fun and you can't go wrong with Nazi Zombies!

re: Very Good

Halo360ODST — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:32:05 GMT

Ok well I guess we can;t b friends jk idk its okay

re: Very Good

Joshua Munoz — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:59:26 GMT

Hate it, thats all I have to say