Switch Lights

The lights are on

What's Happening

Black Ops's Playercard Editor - When Good Ideas Go Bad...

A number of my blogs have ridden on the coattails of Blacks Ops success and popularity and just when I thought I milked the source dry, finished the game or got all the achievements, along comes another blog idea inspired by Black Ops. Should be the last one...maybe. Who knows? Until then though...

Let's talk about the Black Op's Playercard Editor, and...

When good ideas go bad.

So...the Playercard Editor, summarized:

Playercards is a feature that appears in Call of Duty: Black Ops to act as a replacement for callsigns and titles. Emblems are fully customizable, as individual emblem images can be colored, moved, rotated, flipped, resized, and stacked on top of each other. There are over 480 images and over 180 backgrounds to choose from. Each playercard can have up to 12 emblem images layered at once. The emblem images and layers will still have to be unlocked, however. The player will unlock the ability to have their emblem printed onto the weapon of their liking at level 16. All the emblems, layers, and backgrounds the player buys, stays with them when they prestige.


If you're one of the three or four people who haven't played Black Ops then you might not have ever seen the Playercard editior in action...but you still might have read a story or two about it. The latest news post that has everyone up in arms...

(See the original image and read full story at Herd of Cats.)

"If You Use A Swastika In Black Ops, You Will Be Banned"

If you read that headline and think, "Duh, that's obvious," congratulations: You're not an idiot. For everyone else, Microsoft has made it expressly clear that if you use a swastika as your multiplayer symbol in Call of Duty: Black Ops, you will be banned from Xbox Live.


My daughter is the artistic one in the family...always drawing, doodling, writing poetry and creating something out of nothing. She loves the Playercard Editor and is always creating these interesting emblems. (If you're wondering - my daughter is old enough to play, so don't worry). So, the other day she is showing me one of her latest creations...a cute little monster looking thing, created with the various shapes and symbols that are available. She was quite pleased with it. I told her about the above story and asked her if she witnessed any swastikas. I was curious and wondering just how big of a problem it is. She went on to tell me it's not just swastikas either...all kinds of inappropriate user created content. Well, when I say inappropriate, obviously that may depend on personal preference, but listening to her "describe" some of the emblems, I think it's safe to say most would agree it's inappropriate.

(On a side note, while my youngest son might not be as artistic, I am impressed with his "chainsaw with a scope" emblem)

Imagine if you will, giving gamers from all walks of life a paintbrush and canvas to create practically whatever they want and trusting they'll handle it in a responsible manner...creating emblems in good taste that represent their character or something significant and worthwhile.

Some are real masterpieces. Very creative. Original. Impressive.

...others...make you question man as the "intelligent" species; some I'm too embarrassed to even mention, and certainly couldn't post photos of here. It doesn't take much looking around on Google to see some perfect examples of what I'm talking about. My feeling on the matter is there are some particularly distasteful emblems. You may or may not agree.

How do people even think this stuff up? Why do people even think this stuff up? I dunno.

Is this kind of creative expression right or wrong?

Should Microsoft and/or Activision (or any company for that matter) have the right to censor content they deem inappropriate? Or ban accounts over it?

It's an interesting topic and one where there is no easy answer or solution. I'm sure if you read the fine print the big guys, the Microsoft's and Activision's, are legally allowed to do this...but should they? It doesn't really bother me if they do.

Its unfortunate we even have to have this debate...but it certainly wouldn't be the first time included features in a game were abused or at least not used for its intended purpose.

When good ideas go bad.


I'm a huge fan of Valve and pretty much all of their games. If you've played them online, then there is a good chance you've used the "spray" feature, but if you haven't...the spray feature is a way you can leave your mark in games like Counter Strike, Half-Life Deathmatch and Team Fortress 2. You press a button, and a "spray logo" is painted on the surface - wall, floor or ceiling. Of course this feature is customizable and allows the user to upload their own logos...and logos can be pictures of anything.

Anything?

Anything!

And yes...you see some rather disturbing images. It's almost like a game of "who can come up with the most offensive image".

It's pretty bad when the Planet Half Life website gives this advice...

"While we're on the topic of all things saucy, avoid using pornographic sprays while in-game. Sure, it's funny to you and a few of your friends, but most gamers feel that if they wanted to see naked women on their screens, they would go to a porn website. Game servers are for gaming, so respect that."

Again...a brilliant feature...seriously marred by those who would abuse the feature.

What are we to do...

...when good ideas go bad?

 

Comments
  • Mod
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions, as the adage goes. Some of the best ideas have the worst consequences - or in this case, the dumbest consequences.
  • There is a reason why most of these games are rated M, however I have to agree that it's kind of disrespectful and embarrassing when people do this.  As gamers we should try to elevate the hobby, however when the mainstream see stories like this, it only elevates the idea that gamers are anti-social miscreants who can't act maturely.  Personally I feel the swastika should be a reason to be banned, however it is kind of hypocritical.  The emblem exists all throughout any WW2 game, and you can even play as a nazi in multiplayer in some of the early MoH games.  

    It's kind of like giving a dog a half a milk bone and holding out on the rest of it.  I'm also pretty sure that a pot leaf has circulated, which I don't know if that's gotten banned, but the question is ultimately of where do we draw the line.  Not so much of what to do when good ideas go bad, as all ideas whether good or bad can be used as is seen fit by the user.  

    It's a tough age we live in, the banhammer can now come down for any reason, and yet at the same time we try to uphold freedom of expression.  There's good reason behind the ban, but you have to dance a fine line of appropriate and inappropriate given the games M rating.  I think the argument is more valid in a T or lower rated game, where people who are immature and unable to rationally comprehend the image   they are exposed to.

  • I know. Why do people have to have their symbol be something inappropriate? Why?

  • Good blog! And I'm one of those four who haven't played Black Ops yet. :P Also: I wanted to point this out before Dean; I'm pretty sure that "Cute little monster thing" is Super Meat Boy.
  • I was in a match with Warbuff and a few others about a week back and we saw in one match, 3 people with a "dong" (I'm saying it as PG as I can) symbols. For one, why would anyone want a symbol of a dong in the first place? Honestly, what's the point? I'm not creative or anything, but I made my emblem go with my clan tag. I think it works nicely.

    As for the swastika issue, I can understand why they would ban over it. Regardless if WWII happened over 60 years ago.

    Final words, it's great Treyarch is letting gamers be creative, but it's sad that the community can't act mature and use it like it should be used.
  • The current system is based upon a reliance on self censorship. They laid out the guidelines for people when they received an account. If people choose not to follow the guidelines set forth, I have no sympathy for them. Microsoft has the right to say what is or is not allowed on their service. Much the same way a store can kick you out for cursing aloud at anyone and everyone that can hear you.

    The real sad thing is when people try to defend the behavior by saying things like that the swastika is a symbol of peace. That may have been once, but considering the number of racial slurs used by CoD players, I'm not gullible enough to believe that the vast majority of people that would use the symbol have ill intentions.

    Great blog. Too bad that behavior like this is usually so institutionalized in the gaming subculture. But like with the internet, anonymity leads to people doing as they please.

  • Just shows how the maturity level of those who use good idea's and turn them bad, are the ones who never grow up ... but hey, someone has to pick up my garbage in the morning?...

  • Since I haven't bought Call of Duty: Blops (Black+Ops=Blops) I don't have to worry about the PlayerCard Editor. It is a creative tool that can make your own personalized stamp; not an explicit or obscure stamp. I believe people should be banned; to many incidence means something needs to be done about it!
  •     I agree with you on keeping this kind of inappropriate content out of game's and have noticed gamer's abusing the Playercard feature on the PS3.

        I am against this mainly because even though the game is Rated M there are still many underage kids playing all kinds of M Rated title's. For example, my nephew is a big fan of the Call of Duty series but sometimes I feel uncomfortable playing with him due to the explicit content that may be shown both in the game or through online feature's such as the ability to use the microphone or the Playercard in Black Ops.

        The way I see it, the Playercard problem can be solved if Treyarch decides to remove some of the images that can be easily used to offend people such as the pickle.

        Anyways, good blog.

  • It's the people Who get offended by these symbols that make them Bad, Not the Symbols themselves. I'm sure that 90% of the people with a Swastika emblem on their player card actually have no idea of its true meaning. They are just doing it for attention and to get under people's skin, Which i might add they have effectively done. I look at it this way. If you don't let it bother you, eventually people will get the hint and realize that they are just immature imbeciles.......Or maybe not.
  • I remember the valve sprays. I didn't have a bad time with TF2 sprays, but most of the time I saw the inappropriate sprays on CSS
  • Also, I'm one of the four who haven't played

  • Mod
    @LEVON - Agreed. When creating games, a developer should automatically assume that we gamers are going to try and do everything in our power to break the box and use everything we can for the exact opposite of what it was meant to be used for, LOL.

    @bjdbuch - I can't answer that...or why they would want to in the first place.

    @Mray901 - Keyword is yet. I'm sure you will one day. Of course that is Super Meat Boy...just for Dean...and HECK NO my daughter didn't create it...HAH HAH. I would have grounded her from the Xbox 360 had she done that. :)

    @AMSacco91090 - Exactly! Why?!? Agree with all of your points, but also agree with Demon. This has long been a problem with Call of Duty. I'm sure it has to do with the vast number of people who play - of course the odds are going to be higher that you have more players who will exhibit that level of behavior.

    @Demon Ragnarok - All true. Great points. And thanks.

    @Kristian - Yeah...I can almost understand some young kid doing it...but when we're talking grown ups...and the deviant nature of some of it...really makes me wonder. I mean, who looks at those shapes and says...I can take that pig and that man and...well, you get the point...I don't know how the thought ever even comes up.

    @BMW - Agree...how long should they be banned? Should there be different levels of being banned?

    @LaMigraJP - Good points. I let my daughter play M rated games (she's older) but I'm always far more concerned with what she will be exposed to (the voice and now features like Playercard) than what's in the game. Heck, I'm clearly old enough to play Mature rated games but I still feel uncomfortable when it comes up. Thank you.

    @Poppa Trauma - Doing it for attention? Hmm...interesting. And I do agree with not letting it bother you. I never tell anyone that I think it's offensive because I'm sure that just fuels the fire. I just ignore it.

    @Tholomew Plague - Oh...I've seen some crazy stuff in TF2. All the Valve online games actually. And yes, I still owe you my profile name. I haven't forgotten.
  • Yeah, I've played almost every valve online game. I used to own them on steam, but my account got irreversibly hacked. So I have this new one, and I'm planning on buying TF2 (after I get a better graphics card) when I get paid.

    I used to play TF2 a lot. And CSS. And a helluva lot more stuff XD.

  • That scared looking monster was cute

  • I have several points to make after reading the post and comments: 1. A swastika appears in Call Of Duty, and so in my mind banning players for using it is nonsensical and hypocritical. 2. If someone wants to use the editor to create bizarre emblems, then they should have that right. America's fascination with PC control over culture should not extend to COD Black Ops... it has gotten out of hand. If you can't ignore an emblem but can take gratuitous violence, then you are WAY too sensitive and hypocritical. I don't play the game to monitor emblems, just to enjoy the content. 3. Look,like it or not this is a mature game that is for mature players- it is not our responsibility as gamers to be police, but the responsibility of the PARENTS of these kids to not have them play the game, period.
  • @DoctorNoX: A couple of points. First, the fact that they're in the single player campaign is for historical accuracy. They're not making any kind of statement with them. Secondly, why should they have that right? If Treyarch doesn't think they should be doing that, then they have the right to ban you for it. This is *not* a freedom of speech issue, as this is a private company. You have a choice: comply with their rules, or don't play the game. It's not like they're sending you to prison if you do it. Finally, can you imagine the s**tstorm if somebody who's not a gamer stumbles across something like this? Say somebody's easily-offended wife walks in when the guy has just been killed by somebody with a swastika in his emblem? And then finds out that Treyarch isn't doing anything to stop it? "GAMERS ARE RACISTS!!!!" or "GAMERS ARE PERVERTS!!!!!" will become the new theme of the day. And Treyarch, as well as so many other gaming outlets, will have to spend time, money, and resources trying to remove the black mark stereotype of gamers. Yeah, it's unfair. But so's life. And sure, it may not happen. But why take the chance?
  • I get a lot of positive feedback on my logo, which is a take on Harvey Birdman/ Hawkman and is fairly obviously connected back to my Live handle Akbirdman (I thought about trying to work in an AK-47 into the logo, although the AK bit is my state not a reference to a weapon, which is admittedly one of my favorites).

    At any rate I don't think there's any question that MS/Acti, etc should have the right to enforce any policy they have in connection with user created content. And by nature of the fact that they are providing a service and a product as a private corporation insures that right is written in stone- First Amendment law doesn't apply in privately held spaces (private property), physical or virtual.

    I really don't see any counter-argument to this that is supportable by logic or legal precedent. I don't mean to offend by this statement, but I stand by it.

    On the other hand, I don't think that MS should enforce gray-area things like people using Jesus' name in vain in chat/their profile (this topic came up in another relevant Blog). It is not MS or any other global corporation's place to watchdog for minor offenses to Christianity; for one thing for a global company like MS, it would mean having to give like attention to slights to any other religion. For another I don't think you can compare a slip up of the tongue which is not meant to antagonize to the using of Nazi icons or other "hate speech" (I've seen a fair number of KKK icons, even one depicting a lynching), which in my mind only is interpreted one way.

    *Ed-On that last bit, the KKK one, I find perhaps more disturbing because I think a bunch of dumb kids use the Nazi symbol like "lol, Swastika, lol," whereas some of the Klan and Stormfront ones I've seen speak to an alarming familiarity with proponents of the White Power movement, their beliefs and custom, and some of their more subtly iconography (like a white triangle with three smaller triangles inside to make a cloaked head, or various numbers like 88 or 311 with a white crescent moon).


    While I find them obnoxious, I don't think the various "blue humor" emblems should be met with the same degree of penalties- but I'd still support MS in any decision in that area- as again that is well within their rights.
  • Oh and incidentally, there's apparently website/forum somewhere with lots of patterns for Blops icons like Pokemon and South Park characters. Not sure where, but I've seen lots of evidence: at about the one week mark there was an explosion of very similar, very good renditions of the more known characters.

  • I guess I just don't get the appeal of having the offensive images on a player card. Yeah, the people creating the images are probably attention whores, and certainly are trying to get under peoples skin, but they can't honestly expect that offended people won't report them, can they?



    I just might be "that guy" when it comes to X-Box Live reporting, meaning that I actually do it. Offensive chat = reported, muted and negative feedback. Harassment = reported and negative feedback. Offensive gamertags = reported. Offensive profile information = reported (although I rarely look at profiles, very rarely). Sending me messages about special lobbies (Message to all friends and recent players... spam crap...) = Negative feedback and being reported for multiple things (depends on type of lobby).



    Some people will call me a Dick for this, saying that I need to lighten up, an stop trying to police the interwebs machine. I must as them, why? I don't go out of my way to report, if it comes to me then I do it. People may ask why I report instead of ignoring it, and the reason is simple; If I have to follow the rules, then so do you. How is it fair that I am abiding by the rules, and then someone else breaks half a dozen of them and carries on like nothing happened?



    Report, report, report. If enough people get reported for doing dumb crap, eventually the number of people doing dumb crap will decrease. Hell add stiffer penalties IMO... get banned from Live and you still have 8 months on your subscription... perhaps you should lose that $.
1 2 Next