The lights are on
Power Member - Level 7
Final Thoughts 04
Broken Sword II: The Smoking Mirror
Note: This is not a review, but merely my musings after having recently
completed a game as part of my Rogue's Adventures playthrough of my
backlog. Follow @RoguesAdventure to keep up with my playthroughs.
Also Note: This was originally written (and game was completed) in December 2012.
Date: Oct 31, 1997 (original), December 16, 2010 (Remastered)
After the commercial and critical
success of Shadow of the Templars, Revolution Software quickly churned out a
sequel using its same Virtual Theater engine it had used for its previous
games. Taking place six months after the original, The Smoking Mirror reunites
American George Stobbart with French Journalist Nicole Collard as they quickly
become entangled in a dark plot involving the resurrection of the Mayan god of
death and sacrifice.
sequel directly after the first game allowed me to compare all the changes and
improvements that were made. The interface largely remains the same, as does
the progressive hint system and notepad. The in-game notepad was much improved
this time around, giving whole paragraphs of information that nicely summed up
what had been going on in the game. The inventory was also a bit more user
friendly when in dialogue mode, as only the objects that would elicit a
reaction from the person would show up.
getting lower scores from most reviewers, I actually enjoyed the sequel's plot
and quality of writing more than its predecessor. The return of Tezcatlipoca
was a much more interesting plot hook than just a bunch of guys trying to rule
the world with some vague Templar powers, and characters like Karzac and the
General (and his mom) provided interesting, more fleshed out antagonists than
the assassin from the first game. Having an actual goal set out - finding the
other two ancient Mayan stones to be used to re-seal Tezcatlipoca in his prison
also gave a better sense of purpose than simply running around the world trying
to solve puzzles.
Where the sequel fell short for me, however, were the puzzle
designs, which for an adventure game is a pretty big knock. Too many times the
solution to a puzzle was to simply talk to this certain character after
learning that certain piece of information. A few inventory puzzles were used,
though the game suffered from the same issue as the first in that you held on to many
objects throughout the game, even after using them in a puzzle. This lead to
not knowing whether they had a second use or not, and the inventory ends up
getting cluttered with stuff that's never used again. Also, the game had only a
single visual puzzle that I can recall, and it's near the very end when you
have to decipher some hieroglyphics on the wall and match symbols. A shame as many
of my favorite puzzles in the first game were visual puzzles like the chess
set and the coded messages.
All in all, I'd say I'm one of the minority that liked the
sequel more than its blockbuster original. The story telling, the increased use
of exciting cut scenes, the characters, and the writing all worked far better
for me, and the finale actually gave a really exciting (though hands-off)
conclusion. The use of dual protagonists worked really well in the middle of
the game to add another element of tension, and it was fun reading the notepads
of both characters as each situation was written from their point of view.
While the game was much shorter than the first, much of the first game's length
was due to the "Director's Cut" that was added a decade later. It's too bad the
puzzle design couldn't improve along with everything else.
No one has commented on this article.