Switch Lights

The lights are on

My Letter To Senator Leland Yee, and Why I Think You Should Write One Too

For those of you not familiar with the name Leland Yee, you may be more familiar with his previous work. He's probably best known for authoring a bill that sought to restrict the sale of what he called "ultra-violent" games, a bill that was deemed unconstitutional. It makes sense that he would use the unfortunate events of recent months to reassert his unconstitutional position. That's only half of what has put him in headlines recently, though.

Today he's probably better known as the man who said gamers have no credibility in the debate regarding the relationship between video games and violence. For an overview of what he said, and his recently revised stance, I suggest you check out Polygon's report on the story. What follows is a letter that was written to Senator Yee last week, in response to his original comments:

Hello Senator Yee,

My name is Jonathan Gregory, I am a former Computer Science Major and current English Major at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. I'm sending this email in response to your claim that I have no credibility when speaking on the subject of violence in video games. I realize that a lot of people will not respond in a polite manner, so I wanted to take this time to attempt to convince you of the ignorance of your stance. You don't know the slightest thing about me, or any of the other people you so callously generalized. 

I am not a monster Mr. Yee, I don't lust for blood and violence. I'm thoroughly against our country's constant military action around the globe and think that, in a perfect world, the need for weapons would be nonexistent  Gaming is a way for me to get away from the world, just like movies or books or TV may be for you or people you know. I certainly don't go into a game, even a violent one, with the sole intent of committing violent acts and inflicting pain. To suggest that you know me, and every gamer, on such an intimate level as to be able to question our judgement and suggest we are not capable of properly exercising our right of free speech is horrendously offensive.

Despite what are clearly insults directed from you towards me, and people I know and love, I am still willing to politely ask you to, at the very least, step away from the debate on video games, violent or otherwise. Seeing as you have proposed unconstitutional legislation and continue to pursue the unconstitutional stance you made public with that effort, I as a citizen of the United States would like to encourage you to strongly consider resignation from your held public office; I should also sincerely hope that your constituency is just as offended by your insinuation that they are animals, undeserving of the right to speak their mind, as I am. I don't purport to know you or your core values. I have never met you and I am not one of the people you represent. However, I do find the values you've set forth as your own in this situation to be deplorable.

Signed, with more than a bit of animosity towards you,

A Gamer Who Doesn't Lust For Blood

Although Senator Yee has since backed off of his original statements, he doesn't seem like a man who mispoke. There was no improper translation or misuse of a word when he suggested that gamers lust for violence. He also continues to fault the the video game industry, and not the consumer - many of them parents or guardians, for putting violent games into the hands of children. 

He may not be your representative, but his actions could have an impact on all of us. His unwavering, unconstitutional stance that video games are to blame and should be regulated by governmental authority has only evolved in how it is presented. I encourage everyone who reads this to write him in their own words. Whether or not you feel as strongly, or perhaps even more so, about this than I did when I wrote what is reproduced above, I encourage a civil tone if you choose to write him. You can pen your own letter and send it him via Senator.Yee@senate.ca.gov .

Comments
  • Hahaha nice. You're a smart guy.

  • More and more I think this is one of those any press is good press for him. The more people get mad at him and talk about him just helps him. Come next election he's going to play the "I'm the one standing up to protect your kids, and not backing down to flood of hate mail from people addicted to violent games." His law was struck down now I'm just going to leave him to be one more name no one remembers.
  • This is a great idea. Shame we don't matter though.

  • There's truth to what he says, from a different perspective though. I don't think he is talking about REAL lust for violence, but that we encourage the violence to appear in our videogames. I won't deny this, but we are somewhat vocal on what should be in out next videogames.

    And from another different perspective, yes, gamers aren't people who are credible because we aren't stupid people that go kill in real life. The real issue is that there ARE people who use videogame violence and imitate it. A few months ago, two adults killed their mother through something they learned in GTAIV. This IS a real case.

    While we must defend the industry, we aren't the people he's aiming towards at. I don't think his total goal was to anger us, but to acknowledge that this is an issue we can't look back at. Many of us will probably say "Mental Illness is the issue" or "Stupid people" and so on, and to an extent, I will agree. However, it is proven that the guys that killed their mother had no mental illness. They could be stupid, but not by nature.

    While I do somewhat think it is a thing that we should acknowledge and work out, I hardly think that gun violence will drop with reducing or banning gun violence in our videogames. We have drugs, gangs, mafia, wars, etc... which they are mostly to blame.
  • Perhaps a psychological test should be given to everyone wanting to purchase a rated "M" game, just so we know there not serial killers. Or maybe people could just teach there kids good morals, ethics, and most importantly "Common Sense". Then maybe somebody won't actually kill another person and seriously blame it on a video game like GTA IV. A game that undermines the actuality of real life. In other words, it would take an idiot or a child to look at GTA and think that could actually happen, because more than likely it won't. The reason GTA got so famous was because it consistently made fun and poked at real life situations. Allowing the gamer to sit on a virtual couch and watch a television that doesn't really exist, along with shows that obviously would not be allowed on real TV. But that's what makes it "funny", not "REAL". Get over it kids and dumber adults. The game is fake. Let's leave it that way.

  • This would be a great argument, too bad us gamers have no credibility though. /sarcasm

  • It's great that a lot of gamers are getting more and more involved with this issue. What many politicians need to realize is that gamers and developers should also have a say in the debate, instead of just anti-violent media groups and the politicians themselves.

  • Awesome idea and letter man. Too bad that 'ole Mr. Yee isn't ever convinced by "little people." Your letter put him in his place, though, and I hope it's actually read.

  • Smart move. I wonder if he'll respond.

  • Just go ahead and cc this letter to the (not so) esteemed senator from Tennesee as well... :)

    Good stuff man, we don't always agree, but your points were civil and valid on this one...

  • "Politics. How tiresome."
  • "Signed, with more than a bit of animosity towards you..."

    Nice touch, though it may drive him further to validate his point on our lack of credibility.

  • I agree with you. You had many valid points.