What Is a Forgiving Game? - ccidog Blog - www.GameInformer.com
Switch Lights

The lights are on

What's Happening

What Is a Forgiving Game?

When I review a game at DAGERS, I often talk about whether or not a game is forgiving. But what does this mean? What makes a game forgiving, and why, if a game is forgiving, is it more accessible? And how is it possible for a game to be both challenging and forgiving at the same time?

 

Simply put, a forgiving game is a game that allows the player to make mistakes without undue negative consequences. The further back in game history one looks, the less and less forgiving games are. For instance, in the original Super Mario Land, if a player died at the very end of a stage, they would have to go back and replay the entire stage. And if they burned through their entire allotment of lives, they would be confronted by those two evil words, “Game Over,” which would force the player to go back to the beginning of the world, if not the beginning of the entire game. This is a classic example of an unforgiving game—a game in which the slightest error in timing could send Mario plummeting to his death.

 

However, in modern games, there has been much effort to take this hard edge off of game play. A game can be forgiving in lots of different ways. Here are ten of the most common.

 

1. The ability to change difficulty whenever necessary

This is the most basic element a developer can include to make a game forgiving. In effect, if a player is having trouble with a particular sequence, they can determine whether changing the difficulty makes it possible to complete that part. This could take a form similar to that in the Soul Calibur series, which allows players the option to retry the level on a lower difficulty after they are defeated on a stage. Or it could be a distinct option which the player can access at any time within the game’s menus.

 

2. No punishment for selecting a lower difficulty

One game released a few years ago referred to players in explicit and insulting terms if they selected the easiest difficulty. While this is an extreme example of how not to make a game forgiving, punishment for selecting lower difficulty happens more than one might think. Whether it be refusing to let players access certain areas or only unlocking certain features on higher difficulties, if a game punishes a player for playing on a lower difficulty, it is by definition unforgiving.

 

3. One single mistake doesn’t kill the player

Perhaps the single most important element that makes a game forgiving is that single mistakes don’t ruin a player’s chances of beating a level. To illustrate this, compare the Prince of Persia series to Darksiders II. Both of these games include free-running elements and puzzles that require quick reflexes as the character jumps from wall to wall and executes other acrobatic maneuvers. The main difference is that in Prince of Persia one missed step or mistimed jump could kill you, since falling from above a certain height is always fatal. By contrast, in Darksiders II, when the player fails a free-running puzzle or falls from a great height, Death’s reaper form takes over and flies the player back up to safety with a minor penalty to their health. This means that the player is free to attempt the puzzle again without having to start over from the last save point. If they continue to fail, they will eventually die. But they don’t die simply as the result of one failed run or one mistimed jump.

 

4. Lots of save points, or the ability to save on the fly

This next point is one of the most crucial aspects in determining whether a game is forgiving. If there are only a few preset points at which a player can save, then they will be forced to retread the same ground over and over again every time they die, in much the same way that the original Mario games made the player redo the entire stage, even if they died when trying to grab hold of the flagpole at the very end of a stage. Games can do one of two things, or both. They can either include lots of preset save points, or they can allow the player to save at their discretion. Either of these will ensure that no matter where a player is, if they are continually failing and having to reload a game, they will not spend a lot of time retreading the same ground before they can retry the point at which they failed.

 

5. The ability to respec a character’s skills and abilities

This element usually only affects games in the RPG genre, where the player can take multiple paths and develop skills in the order that best fits their play style. What developers have to be careful to avoid is a player getting locked into a particular skill set, and that skill set not being able to flex to a player’s needs at a particular point. If a game allows the player to reassign skill points, even at a cost, it means that the player always has the option to explore different mechanics to overcome various situations.

 


6. The ability to regain health or lives by various means

The line of Mario games on Nintendo 3DS perfectly illustrates this point. Not only are the classic green mushrooms present, which immediately grant the player an extra life, but Mario gains an extra life for every 100 coins he collects. This means that if a player is burning through a lot of lives in New Super Mario Bros. 2, they have multiple ways of refilling their supply, thus making it harder to actually run out of lives and get the dreaded “Game Over.” Another way in which a game can be forgiving in the area of health and lives is if it includes an automatic health regain feature, as is common in many first person shooters. All of these methods of restoring a player’s life mean that even if they take repeated damage, there are limited chances of dying or of getting a “Game Over” and having to restart large portions of the game.

 

7. The ability to refill supplies at any point in the game

Many games include a loot or item system that provides the player with things such as special weapons or potions that they can use whenever needed. If the player has the option to refill these supplies at any almost point in a game, it means that no matter what situation they go in to, they can always go into it prepared. A perfect example of this is Blizzard’s Diablo series, in which any time a player is not embroiled in combat, they have the option to return to town via the town portal and sell loot they’ve picked up and buy new supplies. This in turn means that the player will always have a potion or two for when things get dicey and can always make sure to go into battle with the best gear and weapons.

 

8. Multiple means of accomplishing objectives

More and more games are including sandbox elements. This means that a game may have several different paths one can follow to complete objectives. In Dishonored, the player is a supernatural assassin. Because of the way the game is designed, the method of play is almost completely up to the player. They can either take the aggressive route, going in guns blazing and killing everybody, or they can take the strategic route and accomplish their objective without anybody knowing they were there and without shedding a drop of blood. What’s even more important is that these paths are not mutually exclusive. Rather, the player can at any point choose to alter their play style to fit the situation. As a result, games that include this kind of variation are usually more forgiving than games that do not.

 

9. Large target areas

On the mechanical side of things, if a game includes large target areas for specific objectives, it is harder for a player to overcompensate in trying to hit the target. Most first person shooters would be a good example of this. Although not highly realistic, in most shooters you can kill an enemy by shooting any part of his body, even if it takes multiple shots. This means that the player doesn’t have to take the time to line up a perfect headshot to get the job done. This principle can also apply to platforming games that have large landing places for jumps and large areas to maneuver in.

 

10. Time windows that allow for mistakes

Finally, if a game employs time based puzzles, it is important for a forgiving game to have such puzzles allow for player error. Returning to the Prince of Persia example, many of the puzzles involve running from one end of a room to the other over a series of jumps before a door closes, requiring near perfect execution in order to make it in time. As a result, a player has to be extremely proficient at this type of maneuver before they attempt such a puzzle. These kinds of situations can make games very unforgiving, especially when one misstep can doom the entire effort to failure. Sufficient time windows are extremely helpful in making a game forgiving.

 

By now it has been illustrated that a forgiving game can still be challenging. Such a game is not necessarily easy to beat, but simply gives the player ample opportunity and resources to overcome challenges without forcing them to retread ground they have already completed.

 

 

For more articles on game accessibility, please visit DAGERS, or find us on Facebook or @dagersystem.

 

 

 

Comments
  • Mod

    To err is human, to forgive, devine. ;) Good encapsulation of how difficulty in modern games can vary depending on various features. For myself, the most important are save anywhere, multiple options for approaching objectives, and the ability to change difficulty on the fly.

  • my favorite health regaining ability was probably in mario 64, all you had to do was take a dive and resurface for air, full health. This was a nice read.

  • I've been playing Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time on the HD collection, and the lack of forgiveness is bugging me. There was one time where to get through an area on time, I decided to take a health penalty assuming there would be a water fountain nearby to refill my health. But instead of a health regain, I was transported into a boss fight and ended up reloading to do the entire section over again without the health penalty.

    As someone who is most interested in the story in games, I really like when they let you change difficulty whenever you want but not when they prompt you if you are defeated. Then, I'm too stubborn to lower it and may end up not finishing the game.

  • As long as a game lets me save anywhere or have save points certain distances away from the last, I'm happy.

  • Good article. I can only think of how Demons Souls is none of these things...
  • Tomb Raider has wonderful checkpoints, so you never really have to repeat too much if you happen to die. Considering that you can die quite easily, that's a great thing.

  • To be honest, I like games that are slightly unforgiving, as it makes me get incredibly good at them. Also, Sands of Time is far more forgiving than you are giving it credit for with it's time rewind mechanic, and the remake is so forgiving it is almost painful. Devil May Cry is a good example of an unforgiving game, and I love it. It is challenging in a way that makes you get good at the game, and it never feels cheap. I don't think that unforgiving is bad, and I certainly don't think forgiving games are bad. They are just different play styles, and offer up different kinds of challenges.

  • What makes a game forgiving? MICROTRANSACTIONS

  • A really interesting look at how game mechanics impact accessibility.  I enjoy your game reviews at DAGERS because how a game actually melds with various disabilities is historically only understood by buying, renting or borrowing the game yourself.  

    I thought of your perspective with regard to fine motor skills as I played Tomb Raider.  Personally, I was blown away by the game's captions providing a new level of narrative accessibility by captioning auditory cues within the narrative such as the wind slamming shut a door or Lara gasping at the sight of treasure.  However, I understood that the QTEs were unforgiving for difficulty with fine motor skills but I did not fully consider the required two handed control scheme as a game breaking obstruction until your review.    

  • Checkpoints. Definitely the biggest gaming development ever. Can't remember how many times I got hung up on an NES game right before dinner because of their absence. Another nice blog Josh!

  • Games definitely have changed for the better in this occasion. With the evolving story telling in games, it is good for developers to create more accessible ways to follow the story.