Switch Lights

The lights are on

What's Happening

Treyarch Fires Shot At Single-Player Only CoD Players

Call of Duty's online multiplayer has earned a reputation for tempering its solid gameplay with an often obnoxious online community. Of course that whole bad apples rule applies, particularly when you've got a Call of Duty-sized bushel. Don't think that Treyarch hasn't noticed all of those players who opt out of multiplayer, however. They have, and they're not happy about it. Fortunately, they're trying to address that issue instead of just impotently whining about it.

"As popular as COD is, there are a lot of people who don’t play multiplayer,” says David Vonderhaar, Black Ops II's game-design director. “And quite frankly, this bugs the s--- out of us. They should all play MP. And Combat Training helps us get there.”

The biggest change to the game's returning Combat Training is how the mode is integrated into players' multiplayer progression. Instead of keeping Combat Training rankings in their own separate ecosystems, like the first Black Ops did, experience that you earn in those matches feeds into your general multiplayer career. Combat Training includes match types designed to ease players into CoD's multiplayer, mixing teams of both human players and bots, for instance.

Black Ops II's training modes feature bots that can play objective-based matches, so you're not just learning how to blast people into oblivion. You're actually learning the maps and how to effectively perform as a team. Both skills will serve you well. Perhaps you won't get chewed out as much when you dip your toes in the online waters, but you may want to keep your finger on the mute button, just in case.

 

[Via One of Swords]

Email the author , or follow on , , , and .

Comments
  • *** em lol let them do what they want, they're paying for your game anyway. Maybe release some single player dlc and they'll pay the more money you're actually looking for.
  • Why does this bug them? because they aren't getting these players money for map packs? If I spend 60$ on a game, don't tell me I have to play it a certain way or i'll "bug the ***" out of you. That would be like bethesda coming out and telling off all the skyrim players who avoid the main quest, It's just irritating of them.
  • I'm not a big fan of the MP on the COD games(though they can be fun, sometimes). I'll play it here and there. I've only mostly enjoyed their sometimes short, but satisfying SP portions. I say, if it bugs them so much...make a MP only COD game. Or maybe make it, so gamers can buy them individually at a lower price for each version. Co-op with a friend is loads of fun though.
  • I actually really enjoy CoD primarily for single-player (and Spec-Ops on the IW years), but I do dabble in the multiplayer as well. But frankly, I couldn't blame people for avoiding the mp. Treyarch, have you seen a large portion of the CoD playerbase? I've never seen a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. I had much more fun playing against bots in Black Ops 1.
  • Still doesn't make me want to play their stupid multiplayer - I play games for the story campaign not multiplayer. Activion/Treyarch are not pulling me into that fold no matter the perks.
  • I find it somewhat hilarious that this guy is irritated over the online portion, i.e. the part the pays the company the most via dlc and not what I as a designer would be pissed at, namely that they didn't finish the game in singleplayer/co-op that I invested countless man hours, etc. to create without bugs since most players don't finish the games like that article a while back here on the site mentioned.
  • I don't have interne! What am I supposed to do? I play multiplayer at friends houses sometimes, but Singleplayer has always been what drew me to games.
  • i dont play the MP in CoD very much, maybe if a few buddies invite me to play but thats about it. Personally i find it repetitve and boring after about 2 matches, plus the screaming 13 year olds dont help
  • I only want COD for the campaign. I really like the campaigns, the multiplayer would not be bad if people didn't curse, yell, blast music, and cheat. I don't like muting everyone, but I do. I only play the MP when my brother bugs me to. I prefer to play against bots if I'm not playing the campaign.
  • To me, multiplayer is like a bunch of monkeys throwing poo at each other. The reward is a carrot on a stick with no narrative payoff so it doesn't interest me. I find it funny that the guy gets so mad about the fact that many aren't interested in MP.
  • How about you shut up and not tell people how to play the game they paid for developer. These guys are just butthurt because they wont be getting the money from all those mappacks they push out.
  • Talk about an ******* comment... I am not a huge fan of COD, but I don't mind the single player campaign. It's the online portion I'm not a fan of. Mostly because I'm not very good! It's VERY unbalanced. I feel like I just spawn, take two steps forward, and instantly get gunned down by a 14 year old who has been playing for seven hours straight that day.
  • How about making a campaign that lasts more than 4 hours. I can't believe Tryearch would be this stupid. What a bunch of whiny *****es. You're games are the most annoying with lag comp and you want people to play that mess when you give them a disadvantage for having a great connection!? **** you Treyarch, kiss my ***! This really makes me wanna cancel my pre order.
  • double post
  • People should play the game how they want.

    If they only play singleplayer, let them do it.

    If they wanna use a COD game as a doorstop, it's their game, they can do what they want with it.
  • This just further cemented the idea that I have no interest in Black Ops II. Screw you, Treyarch!
1 2 3 4 5 Next ... Last