Switch Lights

The lights are on

What's Happening

What Subscription-Based Consoles Could Mean For Gaming's Future

Earlier this month, Microsoft launched a new program in its U.S. stores that allowed customers to purchase a new Xbox 360 for $99 with an added monthly fee. Microsoft says this is merely a test program, but what could this mean for hardware sales in the future? We spoke to a number of industry analysts to get some perspective.

"It is an interesting proposition and it does offer a strong value to price sensitive consumers," said Jessie Divnich of EEEDAR. "We know this model works within the cellular market, and this could be a big opportunity not just for Microsoft but all future consoles. Especially as the next-generation of consoles move to being more of a service based value add product, rather than a hardware value add.

"Retailers are going to pay close attention to the feedback from the Microsoft Stores on this new strategy.  If successful, we should expect all major retailers to roll out the program in the next 12 months."

Michael Pacther of Wedbush Morgan believes this could be the start of a new trend. "I think the key is that the next generation consoles might only be sold this way, so instead of charging $300 – 600 for a console, charge $99 and sign people up to a “data” plan (like mobile carriers), charging enough to cover the cost of the hardware.
 
"Count on seeing that next generation if Microsoft has success with this offer."

Billy Pidgeon of M2 Research said this move by Microsoft isn't surprising considering how well it works with mobile phones.

"What's perhaps more significant is that the $99 hardware two-year sign-up represents a transition towards a higher dependence on a service model," he said. "This would also allow Microsoft to get out ahead of a Google or Apple connected TV service that offers games and other interactive features in addition to multimedia on demand.

"Still, I think it's necessary to add real consumer value -- such as open access to free downloadable or streaming games, video and other multimedia -- to justify a monthly fee in the $10 to $20 range.  A play by Google or Apple would likely offer more consumer value for far less, creating a very competitive ecosystem for more dedicated gaming plays."

If consumers continue to expect the most advanced graphics and hardware technology in their newest consoles without paying more than $299-$399, maybe Microsoft is onto something? Are you prepared for a subscription-based hardware future or would you still prefer paying a on-time price? Sound off in the comments below.

Comments
  • personally I hate this, but if it works with lower income families who can pay it off this way, but not the $300 im ok.
  • what if people decide not to pay the rest?
  • Crash and burn subscription plans, crash and burn,
  • on time price

  • Mod
    So, what are the penalties if you break the contract? I'm not feelin' this at all. There are already enough contractual deals you have to make in life.
  • NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! looks like I will be sticking with nintendo for the first few years again :/
  • I will NEVER buy a console where I have to pay monthly. I'll end up paying more that way than I would if I just buy it outright. I don't need another bill on top of the others I already have, the day this becomes the only choice is the day I stop gaming.
  • I think i would want to wait a year or two before getting a next gen console (when they come out) anyway. I would probably purchase it full as i feel more comfortable with owning the console instead of just renting it. Anyway, i guess i dont really know enough about this type of program to make a decision.
  • How about this. Screw it. I'd rather pay everything off in one payment then end up owing money.
  • wasn't this already posted on this website?
  • I think Microsoft is forgetting that not every one can toss up $10 or $20 just like that. Those idea is ridiculous, there are people that struggle with saving up for one console and now they want to add a monthly fee for its services? I honestly hope this idea doesn't pass, its outright stupid.
  • I'm slowly starting to like my PC more and more lately ^_^
  • It is only good in the sense that if you don't have all the money right up front, and don't have the patience to wait to buy a console. I am distrustful of the fact that you have to sign a contract, and the fact that you end up paying more going this route.
  • Line up the consumers, it's time for some more squeezin' *Milk milk*
  • So if I'm understanding this right, they essentially want you to pay a small price for a console, and then continue paying for it in order to keep it working. Yeah, no.
  • Its a 99$ system that is simultaneously a 400$ system, *** off microsoft.
  • i hate the idea... i rather save up enough money to own my console than do a rent to own that could be repo type thing
  • Imagine getting the faithful red ring in the first 2 years, while you're still making payments.
1 2 3 4 5 Next ... Last