Switch Lights

The lights are on

What's Happening

Man Sues Ubisoft Over Assassin’s Creed Story

John Beiswenger, author of "Link," has taken Ubisoft to court over claims the publisher lifted story ideas from his novel to create the Assassin's Creed universe.

The complaint, which was filed earlier this week in a Pennsylvania court, outlines many of the similarities between the book and the game. In "Link," the plot introduces the conception and creation "of a device and process whereby ancestral memories can be accessed, recalled, relived, and re-experienced by the user."

Both also include spiritual and religious tones, assassinations, and characters experiencing historical events through their ancestors’ memories. "Ubisoft have directly copied, and directly and contributorily infringed on the whole of Plaintiff’s copyrighted work," the lawsuit claims. "Link" was first published in 2003.

Beiswenger is seeking 1.05 million in damages and up to $5.25 million if the judge rules Ubisoft knowingly infringed on the copyright, in addition to halting the release of Assassin's Creed III and related products.

Ubisoft said it does not comment on ongoing litigation.

The complaint in PDF form can be read here.

[via Patent Arcade]

Comments
  • The author has a point but as others have said, demanding the halt of a huge, successful, and creative (from the gameplay standpoint) game is just a jerk move.  Plus, it's taken him 9 years to notice.

  • "Animus" is a better name then "Link" anyway i thought Shigeru Miyamoto was suing when i first heard the title of the book

  • Well, this is a real bummer!! My question is, why has it taken this dude this long to come foward with his claim... I mean, there has been 4 games already all with the same exact stuff. Why not say that Ubisoft screwed him over earlier? Whatever..
  • This is udder bulls*** i swear id Assassin's Creed 3 is delayed I might actually have to kill him. And by the way I did a little research about your book, and I couldn't even find it so you know no one has heard of it if you can't find it on Google or Wikipedia so shut up and stop your complaining just because you could not find success in your silly little book. It does not mean somebody else can do it with a slightly similar idea.
  • To the person sueing: *** off. And to Ubisoft, don't you DARE let them halt AC3.

  • No way this guy will ever win this case.  But if he delays the release of Assassin's Creed 3 at all there will be hell to pay

  • So then, why hasn't Bungie been sued by James Cameron, Christopher Rowley(The Vang), and Larry Niven(Ringworld).
  • I understand why he wants the money it was his idea but must he really put them through that much trouble by delaying the game just take the money and leave them alone
  • "Beiswenger is seeking 1.05 million in damages and up to $5.25 million if the judge rules Ubisoft knowingly infringed on the copyright, in addition to halting the release of Assassin's Creed III and related products." Does he really think he can get that much money? even if Ubisoft are found guilty they'll most likely settle for less then that. but then again I'm no Legal expert.
  • As gamers I can understand everyone's dismay about the possible delay of ACIII.. but, if this DOES have legitimate backdrop then we should all kind of feel for the guy. How would you like it if you came out with some major breakthrough, a really sweet idea, and people just snatched it and ran off with it that had more means to reach the public. IF, and that is a HUGE if, these claims are legitimate.. I say pay the man.
  • seriously? i have come to the conclusion that there are people out there with nothing better to do than sit around and find something to sue someone else over. there are so many stories that have been duplicated and retold over the course of history. and lets all be honest... apparently the crew at ubisoft did a lot better job telling the story than mr beiswenger because they are the ones with one of the top gaming titles.

    ubisoft: please put this guy in his place and keep up the great work. hands down one of the greatest and most enjoyable incorporations of history into gaming. and to be such a big front runner for such a relatively young title. bravo ubisoft. assassin's creed was the reason i bought a 360 all those years ago and i cant wait for 3.

  • http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/patrick-bateman-with-an-axe
  • I hope he dies in a car fire. Now read the rest, jerk. Be flattered not envious. No one should own fictional concepts. Individual stories are another case entirely but a concept should be free to explore through all creative mediums and by anyone who wishes to build their own work around it. Imagine an author could claim rights to time travel or space flight, orcs and magic; we'd be screwed.

  • Busted! Naughty naughty, you'll get caughty.

  • If this guy screws up the date I'm get pissed.

  • lol he just NOW sued them? The game's been out for years. I bet you he was waiting for the franchise to become big enough so he could get a lot more moolah.
  • Seems like an odd time to do it you know it being the 5TH GAME IN THE SERIES FOR CHIRST SAKE
  • Well, I have been waiting for AC3 to come then they stop the release of the game. I can't believe they will stop the release of AC3 I was looking forward of playing AC3.

  • how sad man this barely wants sue and really dont think he will win anyways sure they will see he just in it for the money. plus the way his gay book is isnt even original so he needs stop thinking he got all the ideas for his big on his own. a lot of games moies and book get ideas from other sources.

  • http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.pdf §504 · Remedies for infringement: Damages and profits (on page 160) The research I have done on this today leads me to believe that he is trying to sue for "actual damage and profits". In this case he would say that Ubisoft made $x.xx in profit off of this franchise plus I suffered damages to my brand in the amount of $x.xx. Ubisoft then can say that the parts of the story that are similar equate to this amount of the profit. In reality the question the judge would ask a jury is could whether or not the Assassin's Creed story could have reasonably been made as is with out any prior knowledge of the book "Link"? The answer to that is a no-brainer. Kevin Sorbo (yes that Kevin Sorbo)and Gene Roddenberry even used a similar idea of Genetic Memory in Andromeda season 1 episode 18 "The devil take the hindmost"... which aired April 16th 2001 (gasp). What will likely happen is Ubisoft will settle out of court or they will be ordered to pay for "statutory damages". The amounts in that case would range from "not more that $150,000" (for willful infringement, which this probably wasn't) all the way down to "not less that $200" (for unknowing infringement). as a side note, has anyone been able to find this book actually for sale somewhere?