Switch Lights

The lights are on

What's Happening

New York State Bans Sex Offenders From Online Gaming

As part of a new initiative dubbed “Operation: Game Over," more than 3,500 registered sex offenders were banned from online gaming.

Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman made the announcement today, adding that participants in the program include: Microsoft, Apple, Blizzard Entertainment, Electronic Arts, Disney Interactive Media Group, Warner Brothers and Sony.

“We must ensure online video game systems do not become a digital playground for dangerous predators. That means doing everything possible to block sex offenders from using gaming networks as a vehicle to prey on underage victims,” said Schneiderman.

“I applaud all the companies participating in this first-of-its-kind initiative for taking online safety seriously and purging their networks of sex offenders. Together we are making the online community safer for our children, not allowing it to become a 21st century crime scene.”

Operation: Game Over is the first time the law has been applied to online video game systems.

Convicted sex offenders in New York must register all of e-mail addresses, screen names, accounts so websites can remove potential predators. Gaming companies have now agreed to remove their game accounts as well.

“At Microsoft, we continually evaluate ways to manage safety for our 40 million Xbox live members and particularly for children on our service," said Rich Wallis, Vice President and Deputy General Counsel for Microsoft. "Our partnership with the Office of the New York Attorney General helps further this cause.

"By leveraging the online identity information all registered sex offenders are required to provide, we are able to help reduce potentially harmful situations. We’re supportive of Attorney General Schneiderman’s efforts to make the Internet, including online gaming environments like Xbox Live, safer for everyone.”

The Entertainment Software Association SVP Christian Genetski said, “Our industry welcomes appropriate efforts allowing people of all ages to play games in a safer environment. Online game play with friends is a social experience and we encourage parents to be aware of what games their children are enjoying and with whom they are interacting in the virtual space.

"Through the use of robust parental controls and awareness of the online world, playing games online can be a fulfilling and rich experience.” 

Comments
  • Can they ban the loud-mouth, racist little kids too?
  • I don't understand how they can enforce this. What stopping said offenders from making different e-mail accounts??

  • That sucks for sex offenders that don't elicit kids on PSN and Live. What I think they should do instead is have age separate servers/channels, that way you'd have to friend them and form a game with them to mix minors and 18+ year olds. Then only let the kid accept friend requests of 18+ gamers if given permission by their parents account. Added bonus: no more 12 year olds squealing and yelling jibberish when you game. I just don't think it's fair for them to not be able to game online. Yes separation from children's games and such is a good way of stopping them from causing further trouble, but they should still be able to play with other adults. If your over 18 years of age and you tell someone, you don't know, where you live or meet them somewhere secluded, that is a risk you take and is poor judgement. Sidenote: Parents watch what your kids do online. It's dangerous out there in cyber space and unfortunately kids will connect with bad people unless they're warned of the dangers. Take some responsibility.
  • I don't understand how they can enforce this. What is stopping said offenders from making different e-mail accounts??

  • I don't understand how they can enforce this. What is stopping said offenders from making different e-mail accounts??
  • What's a sex offender?
  • Seems like a fine idea, other than the wrongly persecuted. Cases of teenagers being convicted "child pornographers" for sexting their boyfriend/girlfriend. Evidently sometimes not even the intended recipient or sender gets convicted but just a random person who had the misfortune of being on the mass message list...

  • Taking away a persons rights because you dont feel safe? talk about a civil liberties violation if i ever heard one. You can be a RSO for peeing in a public space. now you can be banned from xbox live for being an RSO. I dont agree with first amendment right punishments, thats what this is. Gaming is a medium of communication, not a forum for political causes. Any law banning gaming or any medium is violating our first amendment rights.
  • I don't see how this will fix anything, but ok…
  • I think this is a great idea.  I agree with another post in feeling a bit naive that I never thought that online gaming could be used by sex offenders to hurt children.  Never crossed my mind, thankfully.

  • I'm OK with this. Good riddance weirdos!

  • While I can see how some innocent offenders will unfortunately be caught in the crossfire, I think it's worth it to get the sick bastards who would try and kidnap children off the internet so the online world becomes a little bit safer for everyone.

  • After reading all the posts on this article and reading further on the actual law, it seems many people are "angry" for some reason. Regardless of some politicians agenda, this is the right thing to do. As someone who knows personally of this kind of situation, its right. If you don't know do not feel bad, ask someone who is responsible, or even myself being in that situation before. More kids are online now then ever before and the standard law needs to apply in kind.

  • This is stupid. Not all registered sex offenders are pedophiles, just like not all pedophiles are registered sex offenders. People can become sex offenders for many things, public urination, public masturbation, sexual harassment, under-age sex (yes I mean both parties are under-age) etc. Why should many of these people who have done nothing to harm children should be banned from online gaming? I see no sense in banning someone who got drunk and peed at night from online gaming,I do think it is wise to ban pedophiles, since they do pose a threat to many young children.
  • its not just about the kid having the microphone, its also about the ability to send text/picture messages... plus i'm sure Charlie Day would not approve of this
  • Are we talking all or serious sex offenders because you can be put in the sex offenders registry for public urination.
  • I'm glad that this is going to help the safety of the children, but should the children who are playing the M for mature games be banned too?

    Edit also after doing some reading into the comments I found that a better idea would be to ban only pedophiles or have servers that would put the sex offenders in the correct age group. I'm glad either way something is being done to protect children and other people who don't know what they are doing when it comes to online, but I think that there could be some compromises in here. I am in no way supporting sex offenders. Honestly they are jacked up, I'm just saying maybe there should be some leeway.
  • I actually agree with this. Try to stop me from buying games because little kids might get their hands on them and i'll be up in arms...

    but keep sex offenders away from online games where they can easily talk to children.

  • This is one of the rare government interventions I'm cool with. I'm glad they're trying to address the true dangers of video games and online communities, instead of attacking the industry as a whole with poorly rooted junk statistic science.

    I'm not sure how successful this will be though. Sadly, some of those creeps might find workarounds.
  • Oh man, there goes half my clan.

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next ... Last