Switch Lights

The lights are on

What's Happening

Assassin’s Creed Film Sparks Hollywood Controversy

Last month, news broke that Ubisoft was working with Sony pictures to bring it’s Assassin’s Creed franchise to the silver screen, but this is no ordinary deal, and that has surprised many film industry insiders.

As NYMag notes, Assassin’s Creed is currently one of the biggest video game properties in the world. Its size has allowed Ubisoft some leverage at Sony’s negotiating table. Sony’s movie deal grants the game publisher approval over just about everything – budget, principal cast, script, release date, etc. However, this kind of control is unprecedented.

One Hollywood talent agent told NYMag, "The whole Ubisoft/Sony deal is a waste of ink, paper and time. The level of control Sony gave up means, effectively, that Assassin’s Creed will never – and I mean never – get made.” Another incredulous insider said, “As a director, even Steven Spielberg cannot get this kind of deal.”

These are interesting sentiments considering that few video game movie adaptations can be considered successful. Last summer’s Disney adaptation of Ubisoft’s Prince of Persia bombed, and Ubisoft hopes that having more control over Assassin’s Creed will improve the film. Then again, Ubisoft is a video game company – it knows plenty about releasing games, but how much does it know about film?

The NYMag article is a thoughtful and insightful piece about how video game companies and movie studios generally work together, and it’s worth a read.

Email the author , or follow on , , , and .

Comments
  • Maybe letting ubisoft have more control over it will actually make it a great movie!
  • I didn't think Prince of Persia was bad... But I've sadly never played the games so that might be the reason...
  • I have faith that Ubisoft will create a better movie than one that Sony would have had majority control of.
  • Uwe Boll is sitting by his phone, hoping that it'll ring
  • Ubisoft is right for wanting some creative control over the film and from what I have heard they are fronting most of the cost. However Ubisoft needs to remember that they make games, not movies.
  • They are giving up that much control that way they can get the deal, because they know it will make lots of money, and it needs to be as close to the game as possible. And Ubisoft made that game.

  • I think this is a good thing. Letting the creators of the game, and thus the story, more control to unprecedented levels has a good chance of giving us a video game movie of unprecedented quality. Of course, if the thing bombs or does not get made it's going to be a long time before we see a developer get this kind of deference again.
  • who the **** cares? maybe if studios would stop ****ing up video game adaptations Ubi wouldn't have to take the reins like this, this is good news as far as I'm concerned, who better to make the movie than the people who made the game? and really whats the difference between storytelling in an interactive form and a non-interactive form? trim some fat, make it all story and there isn't much difference a good story will always be a good story and AC has one of the best
  • I just didn't like the actor that played the Prince. As long as it does get made I would eventually see it. Here's hoping for that Bioshock movie to pull through.
  • Hmmmm. Considering how crapy most video game based movies are, this seems like a good idea. If the movie gets too far from the core AC fiction, then Ubisoft can pull the plug. If AC for some reason doesn't adapt well to a movie, they can pull the plug. If halfway through the development process they realize it is crap, they can pull the plug. That being said, I am a huge AC fan and truly hope that this film is made.

  • Read a similar article about this on IMDB. They seem to underestimate the story telling ability of video game developers and how many more games nowadays are like playable movies. Now, Assassin's Creed is no Uncharted in its likeness to movies, but they're still pretty good. I think that giving Ubisoft more control is actually good thing and that there is a possibility that this movie will be good. Just one thing, dont let "Mr Caffeine" anywhere near the set!!
  • Prince of Persia movie was a good summer movie, but ironically not a good Prince of Persia movie.

    Assassin's Creed is too awesome to be screwed up. I rather it be done right or never at all. I'm glad Ubisoft has that much control.

    If you ask me this is just Hollywood dipshits looking down on Ubisoft, of being able to make a good movie with them having most control.

  • When I read the title I thought "What is this TMZ?".

    I say this is a good thing take it as a sign from fate letting you know NOT to make the movie, besides the only guy that looks like Altar, Desmond and Ezio doesn't even speak english.

    Here's a pic: http://www.deviantart.com/download/130619839/Real_Desmond_Miles_or_Altair__by_Butterfly386.jpg
  • will it still probably suck? yes. can i hope that ubisoft having increased control might lead to it being better than expected? why not?
  • Solution= Don't make the film It already succeeds in its established medium, why take it from its source. And don't give me that "artistic expansion" crap, its a shameless means of making a greater profit period. The video game industry needs to get over their inferiorty complex with hollywood. Hollywood should be clammering to get a piece of the pie not the other way around.
  • Hmm. Well, I hope it gets made. If not, that would be a huge waste of time for both Sony and Ubisoft. That said, I think Ubisoft having more control over approving all of that is good. It more than likely means a movie that will stay truer to the game. I've always thought the AC franchise could transfer well to the big screen, and this gives it the greatest chance of doing well, at least in my mind. Let's hope that talent agent is wrong.

  • That's really interesting. It'd be cool to see an Assassin's Creed movie get released that has Ubisoft backing it so thoroughly.

  • Movies about Games are always a bad idea. Of course I'll change my opinion once they actually make a good game movie.
  • I hope it's good, but if ubisoft has more control over it, who will help the whole movie part of the ordeal?

  • Prince of Persia was not a bad movie. I actually enjoyed it a good bit. It DID bomb at the box office, though. Giving Ubisoft major control over the Assassin's Creed movie could be a mistake.
1 2 3 4 5 Next ... Last