Switch Lights

The lights are on

Pachter Says Activision Wants To Charge For Call of Duty Multiplayer

Activision made some waves with its announcement of Beachhead Studios, a new division designed to provide online "content and services" for the company's Call of Duty franchise.

The company was not clear as to what this would entail, but Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter is certain it means that Activision is ready to start charging players for Call of Duty online multiplayer.

In a story on G4, Pachter did not mince words:

"Project Beachhead absolutely is charging for multiplayer," Pachter said. "I'm certain to my core. Activision said they are working on 'value added, premium content that is exclusive. How do you exclude people unless you do it on the basis of whether they pay or not? What are you going to have a bouncer in front of the club where you play the content? The only way it's exclusive is if it excludes non-paying members."

Pachter is certain that pay-for play is coming, however, he's not quite sure how it will be implemented.

"The exclusive content could be pay as you go, or monthly. Let's say Project Beachhead comes up with 'Call of Duty Universe,' and it launches with Modern Warfare 3 and they say 'if you join here's all the exclusive content and exclusive weapons and we'll charge you a dollar a piece.' Or If they say, 'for $5 a month you get unlimited weapons and all the map packs we bring out for Modern Warfare in perpetuity,' a lot of people will say, 'I'm going to buy three map packs for 15 dollars anyway, so for $60 a year, I'm getting all the unlimited weapons and achievements,' so they could do that. I don't know if that's what they're going to choose to do. I'd say $5 a month is reasonable, though."

If true, it's not going to go over well with fans accustomed to paying only for their Xbox Live membership -- or in the case of PS3 owners, playing multiplayer for free. We've come to expect that multiplayer is included with the $60 price tag of our games, but perhaps that era is coming to an end.

Email the author , or follow on , and .

Comments
  • Pachter! He appears like a villain trying to ruin everything.
  • Dear Pachter, shut the *** up already. Seriously, you are a *** idiot. Read between the lines as to the moves Activision made, they are going for a Free-to-play model, just like Battlefield is doing. Is it really that hard for you to understand? *** A!
  • I didnt buy any of the Call of Duty games for the campaign.$60 plus paying for xbox live plus paying to play multiplayer? Piss off I'll play something else.
  • People will actually pay for Call of Duty monthly. I don't know whether to rejoice or to be in sadness.
  • I hate this guy.  He says stuff that ignites flame wars 9 times out of 10 (and isn't even right half the time), giving other analysts who are actually good at their job a bad name.

  • Mod
    This again?
  • I hope so, then I can sell my Black Ops and get Dead Space 2.
  • I won't mince words either: I won't pay for multiplayer on top of paying for Xbox Live.
  • not to happy about this

  • now battlefield 3 looks even better

  • This is hilarious.  They are actually trying to turn regular games into subscription models based on MMOs.  We see how many of those survive.

    What these fools DON'T see is that when they move to that model, they paint their franchise into a corner.  If a consumer refuses to pay for a subscription, they are not going to buy the game.  As in...at ALL.  Nobody is going to buy Call of Duty just for the single player experience.

    Finally...get ready for pirate underground servers because now those are going to be spouting up everywhere as a counter.  

  • Coming to an end?? I think not...I LOVE CoD but I can say with 100% accuracy that I will NEVER pay to play it. I already pay for Xbox Live. I will just go play Battlefield 3.

  • Pachter has been trying to push this for what feels like a year now. I am not going to say this will kill CoD but it will definitely drive a large portion of the player base over to Battlefield.

    If they are going to make this happen they would need to make radical changes to how Activision approaches its multiplayer support. If you want me to pay a monthly subscription you need to give me content updates similar to an MMO. I am not going to pay $5 a month for a few random maps a year and some weapons.

    They would need to actively police the game, ban cheaters and patch bugs/glitches. On top of that give us say 3-5 new maps every quarter (12-20 a year) new game options and possibly weapons...that may be worth $5 a month.
  • Didn't he say the exact same thing about Black Ops?
  • Pachter is certain that pay-for play is coming, however, he's not quite sure how it will be implemented. Yeah - what this breaks down to is, We love the idea of extracting more money from your wallet but, we're just not sure how we're going to get it yet. Don't fret, we're working on it.
  • what is this the 3rd or 4th time he has predicted this, if i predict the Cavs are going to win the Finals every year sooner or later im going to be right

  • Aw, ****. Not this again...This dude needs to shut up already.

  • actavi$ion you cheap mother ******'s

  • I'm not buying the next CoD...
1 2 3 4 5 Next ... Last