Switch Lights

The lights are on

What's Happening

Nintendo Again At Bottom Of Greenpeace Eco-Rating Scale

Once again, Nintendo and Microsoft scored badly in environmental organization Greenpeace's ratings gauging the eco-friendly nature of consumer electronics.

Nintendo scored a 1.8 out of 10 and got dinged for things like not having a plan to eliminate PVC in its products, not committing to reducing greenhouse gases, and working with consumers and dealing with the disposal of old electronics (known as e-waste). One of the few positive areas for the company is the fact that its products got good marks for their energy consumption.

Microsoft, meanwhile, didn't fare much better, scoring a 1.9. In fact, the company was docked a full point for backtracking on a commitment to phase out BFRs (brominated flame retardants) and PVC in its products by the end of 2010.

Sony scored the best out of the console makers, posting a 5.1, which is up from a 4.9 ranking in the last report.

For more on Greenpeace's report and ratings, head here.

Email the author , or follow on , and .

Comments
  • Staff

    Best.

    Index image.

    Ever.

  • There's no such thing as global warming aka Man Bear Pig!

  • Wow, great graphic.

    I knew my PS3 was good, now it's also good for the environment. :D

  • good for nintendo and microsoft i HATE these pot smoking epa hippies and there made up science.
  • wow, props to sony

  • Okay, WTF is going on? I tried posting a reply to Adam's post (TWICE), and instead they went to Death Note and Brittany.

    (Um no offense to those guys of course)
  • Wow. come one Nintendo, show a little effort! And Microsoft, wtf. Bill Gates is talking about billionaires donating money to good causes, but his company's eco-friendly rating is in the toilet... I wonder how they classified all this.

  • Regardless of whether you believe human activities are having a massive impact on the environment or not, nobody can deny that waste is a big problem; working with consumers to recycle/dispose of old products and conserve materials is very important. The materials used to make these consoles are non-renewable, they will run out someday. Buying used games helps to cut down on waste too, I make a habit of it.

  • Nintendo is family friendly as long as that family stays inside at all times and ignores the declining ecosystem surrounding them.

  • Wow, apparently electronic companies, with the slight exception of Nokia and Sony Ericsson, just plain suck at being environmentally safe.

  • Good for Nintendo and Microsoft there is no global warming.

  • @Adam Biessener:

    I totally agree!-)

  • alot of people are talking about global warming. Personally i do not subsribe to the belief in man made global warming, but I do not think that this graph is focusing on that exclusivly. Landfills are filling up and it is a good thing to try to slow it down, but then again, aren't many of our great cities built on old landfills?

  • Wow, that's sad Microsoft. I thought you were better than that!

  • Wow since Sony is so careful about being eco-friendly maybe I should buy their products from now on cause I'm sure the gamma rays immenate a huge amount of toxic radiation. Way to turn to liberal media to boost your ratings Sony. It seems manbearpig has arrived
  • That's a pretty cool study. And while I agree with people that global warming isn't a problem, it still doesn't hurt to try and green just for the sake of it.

  • Congrats to Sony!  I'm surprised that Nintendo is not on par with Nokia and Sony E.  Mircosoft.... not shocked or surprised in the slightest.

    I don't think any of the console developers will make a big deal of this, but they should attempt to adopt greener practices.

  • Who cares.

  • Liberal propaganda made up by Al Gore. Green = more expensive and less efficient. Global warming is a joke.
  • All arguments about the validity of global warming & the necessity of electronics manufacturing companies to go green aside, I feel it's necessary to point out 1 key problem: why the h___ are we listening to greenpeace? I'm just saying, if I'm looking for how eco-friendly a company is, I'm going to an independent source, not somebody with an agenda.
1 2 3 Next