The lights are on
Even with gaming taking a backseat to multimedia functionality, Microsoft threw a lot of new information at the public with its Xbox One press conference. Find out what the Game Informer team thinks about the new hardware, television features, cloud computing, and, most importantly, game announcements.
Matt BertzGiven that E3 is right around the corner, I didn't expect
Microsoft to focus on software much during the Xbox One Reveal, so I wasn't
disappointed by the lack of compelling game announcements. Instead, Microsoft made its pitch to
the masses with a new convergence device. This vision of a connected living
room intrigues me - who wouldn't appreciate being able to switch from a
football game to Madden in an instant to avoid the Ford F-150 commercial that
Fox has playing on repeat every game break? I also love the idea of
entertaining myself with something other than a static screen while I wait for
a multiplayer match to begin.
After the press conference wrapped, however, I had more
questions than answers regarding the feasibility of this bold new future.
Getting different devices to talk to one another is hard enough work. Not only must
Microsoft make the Xbox One compatible with dozens of different cable and
satellite boxes, it needs to create a critical line of conversation with these
providers and provide incentive for them to keep these systems simpatico
through myriad software updates. Going halfway won't help. If Microsoft only
lands deals with Comcast and U-verse, for instance, what would compel a
DirecTV, Dish Network, or Time Warner subscriber to purchase an Xbox One? This
degree of market segmentation could drive potential customers toward Sony
before we even get to the games conversation.
Matt HelgesonYesterday's Xbox One unveiling event confirmed that
Microsoft's play for the console video game market had always been about the
control of the living room. This new system is designed to be an
all-encompassing entertainment device, and that message was delivered loud and
clear yesterday - perhaps to the expense of the system's gaming potential. But
while the hardcore may say that Microsoft has lost focus on its roots, you have
to admit that on a technological level the instant switching between apps,
live, television is impressive. If successful, it could finally unify your home
entertainment system into one clean interface. That's a plus for consumers.
Microsoft claims it has more new games in development that
ever before, but we have to wait until E3 to see their big guns. However, if it
managed to pack all this next-gen media functionality into a box that also has
the capability to be a truly powerful gaming platform, we all win. If its push
toward entertainment comes at the expense of their core gaming audience, they
will learn how unforgiving the market can be. For me, I'm genuinely excited
about a better, more advanced way to consume TV entertainment and I think Xbox
One represents a step in the right direction. No one, including myself, is
going to pay Microsoft money for a better cable box, and I think the company
knows that. However, if I can get a system that will be great for games plus
let me skip the hideous and unusable user interface of my Comcast box, I'd be
Joe JubaMy enthusiasm for any
new console is dependent on games. Lots of people feel the same way, which could
be part of the reason that reactions to Microsoft's reveal turned negative. If
you're a company releasing a video game console, shouldn't video games take
Microsoft didn't do
that, and in that neglect, demonstrated its lack of regard for gamers. We're
not the audience that Microsoft was talking to; the company was talking to
people who liked Kinect, who don't already own six Netflix-capable devices, and
who don't care about whether or not they can borrow games from a friend.
Microsoft's reveal was a success in that it showed the company's strategic
emphasis on multimedia entertainment, but a failure in the way it further
alienated the hardcore gamers it once catered. E3 is Microsoft's chance to
highlight the exclusive software that will distinguish it from the PS4, so I'm
still excited about the potential of the Xbox One...but it's more in spite of
what I saw yesterday than because of it.
Mike FutterWhat I saw of the services
has me intrigued. I would definitely use the television functions, as I often
swap back and forth between live TV and my 360 when downloading content. I'm
also hopeful about the game offerings that we'll see at E3. We haven't yet
heard from Epic Games, 343 Industries' Halo (game) team, Crytek (Ryse), or
Lionhead. I'm interested in learning more about Quantum Break, as I'm a fan of
Remedy's past work. Once Microsoft has definitive answers (no matter what they
are) regarding used games and connectivity, it'll be far easier for consumers
to judge the landscape.
Microsoft has less than three weeks to get its messaging figured out. Yesterday fell apart from a public relations perspective, with different spokespeople offering a variety of answers to straightforward questions. If that happens again at E3 (or if Microsoft fails to provide concrete responses), the backlash is going to be substantial.
Adam BiessenerAs someone who hasn't
had cable in years and has no plans to purchase it again, I remain unsold on
the Xbox One. The majority of the console's capabilities that Microsoft showed
seemed to me to be a bunch of things I can already do on devices I already own.
I mean, seriously - looking up info on cast members during a movie? Who is in
the market for an Xbox One that doesn't already have a smartphone, tablet,
and/or laptop that can accomplish that just as effectively? The one thing I saw
that interests me is the tie-in to Microsoft's Azure cloud computing platform.
That could conceivably be used in interesting ways by game developers to create
genuinely new experiences. It seems like a lot of engineering overhead for
limited benefit for any multiplatform game, though, so I don't expect to see it
used in any real way except in Xbox One exclusives. Sony reaching out to indie
devs and embracing alternative business models seems far more useful to me and
the games I'm interested in than anything Microsoft said yesterday.
Matthew KatoI'm starting to warm
up to the name and the form factor, but I'm worried what a mandatory, packed-in
Kinect peripheral will do to the system's price. On the whole, a lot of the
features announced for the system - like the PS4 - fall in the
"nifty" category, but don't classify the system as a must-have. I'm
sure when all is said and done, gamers will have plenty of great software to
enjoy on the platform despite yesterday's TV-centric presentation. That said, I
still think Sony's first-party stable of studios is stronger. I'm sure we can
expect a few specialty Kinect and casual experiences to water down Microsoft's
seemingly weighty declaration of fifteen platform exclusives and eight new
franchises in the first year. As far as the used games/online connection
debate, there is still too much we don't know to start casting stones.
Jeff CorkMicrosoft has some
great ideas for the next generation, but it did a disastrous job of
communicating them yesterday. Most of the negative comments and Tweets that I
read were from people who felt betrayed at the company's focus on TV and
seeming indifference to gaming. This is a video game console, right? Well, sort
of. If you haven't noticed that these boxes are more than simple game systems,
you haven't been paying attention. Microsoft is in a tough position. It's
relatively late in the year for a 2013 hardware reveal, and the company needs
to get people interested in its unique nongaming functionality. People who
aren't keyed into gaming, in particular, who mighty think it's cool to say
"HBO" and have their TV switch to that channel instantly. I'm guessing that
Microsoft bet that a few game reveals (including an appearance from the latest
Call of Duty) would be enough to keep everyone else busy until a major
game-focused E3. That's a bet that they apparently lost. One last observation:
Microsoft needs to get its people on the same page on basic items like "Will
there be a fee added for playing used games?" When people are getting
conflicting reports from various spokespeople - and when a Twitter handle
@xboxsupport3 has to step in for a while - it's a sign that things have gotten
out of control.
Ben ReevesInitially I was
disappointed with Microsoft's press conference. I wish it had shown more games,
or at least shown more of the games that it did show. As interesting as the
Xbox One's new TV functionality is, I felt it was a strange way to start a
presentation about a new video game console. It makes me wonder if Microsoft
has lost its focus. The system itself looks great. I love the design and I'm excited about the new
controller. However, I found it silly that Microsoft didn't talk more about the
new controller or the new Kinect. Most of the interesting details about the
Xbox One weren't in the press conference, but had to be read online afterward.
That said, I'm excited to get my hands on the system and play some of its
games. But, if Sony doesn't charge a fee for used games, then I'll be buying a
Tim TuriI leaned toward my
Xbox 360 this generation. In the beginning I think this was a combination of
the system launching before the PS3 and most of my friends being on it.
Microsoft was also smart enough to pack in a headset and let me transfer my
Xbox Live account from its first console, making my go-to system for online
play this generation. But now Sony is taking online more seriously. The company
is including a headset, unlike Microsoft, which is taking the Wii Speak route
and having players use their Kinect to communicate. Sony also appears to be
implementing an Xbox Live style party system. With the PlayStation 4 correcting
its predecessor's mistakes, the gap is closing between the two companies.
However, Sony's impressive PS4 showing could be temporary - we don't know
everything yet. The company could be delaying the more unsavory details,
including used game fees or other hidden tidbits. It's still early, and neither
manufacturer has said much about games for the systems. Come E3 we'll have a
clearer picture, but I'm leaning towards the PlayStation 4 at this point.
Kyle HilliardPresenting new
consoles on a platform outside of E3 is a brand new world. Even Nintendo, which
has fallen in love with its own Nintendo Direct presentations, revealed its Wii
U at E3. Presenting the Xbox One and the PlayStation 4 to the world in an
online stream outside of the conference is a new idea in the world of video games,
and I find myself considering this when thinking about Xbox One's presentation.
Everyone is crying, "Where were the games?" and I can't help that feel that
their absence was a calculated shortcoming from Microsoft. This was purely a
chance to show off the base features and nothing else. E3, a show devoted to
games, is where Microsoft will offer the exciting game-focused bombshells.
Underwhelming is a
word a lot of people are using to describe the event, and I agree with that
sentiment. We got to see the system and the new controller, which is very
exciting, but everything else was blasé. I have a Kinect, but I don't use it,
and I am doubtful that will change. I have a cable box and DVR that I have very
few complaints about, and realistically I don't see myself using the Xbox One
to change channels. Hearing about a new Call of Duty was akin to hearing about
a new Madden. The games continue to be fun, but the next iteration in a yearly
franchise is not exciting. Finally, even as a Halo fan, I don't see myself
watching a show based on the franchise.
The most offensive
takeaway for me is the incredibly confusing messaging about the future of used
games and always online. I can begrudgingly accept the always-online aspect of
the Xbox One considering my current consoles are always online as it is.
However, not being able to simply place a game in my console and play, borrowed
or purchased, is a problem. One of the main reasons I have always preferred
consoles to PCs is the ease of play. Ultimately, I'm not sure what or whom to
believe. Even internally Microsoft doesn't seem to know what it is talking
about. I am willing to give Microsoft the benefit of the doubt on this issue as
we learn more, but it's not looking very good right out of the gate.
Kimberley WallaceI know Microsoft is
saving plenty for E3, especially games, but I wanted more from the
presentation. The TV features look nice and all, but they're not a deal breaker
for whether or not I get a system. Games are the deciding factor. One thing
that got me really excited was seeing the enhanced graphics of Call of Duty:
Ghost. The attention to detail that developers can now give to characters
models and environments looks promising. One of my biggest complaints with
graphics currently is that they fail to capture realistic mannerisms and facial
expressions in games. I'm wondering with the superior technology if developers
can get it right in the upcoming generation. As an avid fantasy hockey player,
the ESPN features to track stats and get alerts on players are a nice bonus,
but that's how I feel about a lot of Microsoft's presentation. I just saw
bonuses, not selling points.
Ben HansonI'm personally not
that excited about the Xbox One. The name is fine, the console design is fine,
the Kinect is ugly, but the push to appeal to avid television viewers and
sports fans does not get my blood pumping. The controller looks great, but
Microsoft's priorities don't align with my interest. While it cited gaming as its
"beachhead" for the system, it also framed the power of the console
as getting them that much closer to "playing real life" through
graphical fidelity. I don't care about pores in the skin and imperfections in
Forza cars. I would like to see something new in the gameplay space. That all
said, it is way too early to write off the system, and I'm curious to learn
more about the upcoming games at E3.
Visit our Xbox Reveal Headquarters for complete coverage of today's news.
Email the author Matt Bertz, or follow on Twitter, Google+, Facebook, and Game Informer.
Was mainly excited to see what Dan said. DAAAANNNN WHERE ARREE YOOOUUU
I love how people attempt to push pros of the 360 in-spite of how terrible the XboxOne's reveal has been and the fact that one of the listings is " was launched first". I really don't see that as being something that's truly commending, given the slew of issues said system had quite quickly into it's life. Sure it had the advantage of showing off the new generation first and with some notable ideas, but once the major companies have released their system, it becomes irrelevant who was first.
The Ps2 came out ahead of the Xbox, yet that had little to do to completely take control of the market when Xbox was released later on. The WiiU came out far ahead of either Ps4 and XboxOne....yet that's done exactly what for the system? Use more concrete and meaningful attributes & accomplishments for something, not who was bloody first... It's what the company actually utilizes within their product over the long run that matters. The core concept of evolution that seems to naturally grow and be developed for the gaming generation, not tack on modifiers to gloss over 'extra features" that in long run....who cares?
"Even with gaming taking a backseat to multimedia functionality"
This sums it up for me. It appears that Sony made sure that gaming was equal to (if not more important than) multimedia bells and whistles for the PS4.
I have both consoles from this generation, and I'll likely have both consoles next generation. The difference will be in which one I buy first. For this generation, I bought the 360 in late 2008 and the PS3 slim in mid-2012 (three years and six years post-launch, respectively).
Based on the information I now have about both next-gen consoles, I will be buying the PS4 sometime around Holiday 2016, and the Xbox One (or its "Slim" variant) sometime in 2019.
Sorry Microsoft, you've ignored your gaming "core" audience since about 2010, so don't be surprised when they ignore you.
I personally was sold with the xbox one conference. A huge issue I have always had being a gamer(and adult swim fan) was playing a game and when i'm in matchmaking for call of duty,halo or even in certain gametypes where you die for a round and you have to sit,wait and entertain yourself for the time being (however little that is).I think the concept is ideal for this exact scenario for when I want to see what's on tv for a quick second before a game starts or when I'm out for the round and i'm not interested in spectating a game. Even though the concept seems so minute and ill inspired right now, it will be highly used in the future. I think that along with the snap feature as well, it can really make a huge difference in terms of getting a player entertained at all times and using their time even more efficiently.
Even though i know I'll be getting both consoles anyway. I will say that i'm leaning more on microsoft's side at this point. Knowing that the console has 15 exclusives and 8 of them being original IP's is very endearing for the hardcore gamer in my opinion. I also think that they did what they needed to in terms of this presentation. They showed the box itself, the User Interface, specs and new concepts for the console.
Overall, I think Microsoft is going in the right direction by separating itself enough from sony and creating its own identity in terms of goals and intentions with their console, but also still being able to directly compete with it as well. I just think that gamers were asking for too much from this conference right now in regards to games which they're probably saving for this little event in roughly 2 1/2 weeks called E3 where you like.....show video games.
I think Kimberley's last line sums it up best for me, "I just saw bonuses, not selling points."
I think that's exactly right. For all of us who were disappointed in the reveal it doesn't have to do with that we don't think the multimedia integration isn't cool or we wouldn't use some of it... it's that it is not what is most important to us.
The games that weren't announced really isn't my gripe either. I think most of us assumed they would save that for E3.
What my complaint is that Microsoft refused and/or danced around the most significant questions that we all have. 1. Do you always have to be online to use your system? 2. Do you have to pay for used games and how will it work if you do? 3. Is the cost of Xbox Live changing? 4. Do the new features (NFL agreement, Halo Series, ESPN stuff) you highlighted cost above and beyond the Xbox Live Gold fee? 5. What is the cost of they system?
These are answers that are not yet answered and it's frustrating to not know the answer. The answers to all of these questions will direct us into which system we'll buy. Because these questions are not answered I can't figure out what I'm going to do and I don't like that. My fear is that the answers to these questions will not be what we want to hear. Why wouldn't I think that if Microsoft won't answer the questions?
I just want solid facts on the Xbox One(And the PS4 for that matter) instead of rumors that Microsoft seems to be making on their own...
Appealing to TV and Sports was the biggest FU I could have gotten. This is, of course, because they didn't mention the DRM plans during the reveal.
My view: The system, if reports are true, will not allow me to play video games. Everything else is rather pointless to me.
I tell you what annoyed me more than anything about the reveal was that Don Mattrick basically mocked gamers with his idiotic comments like, "If you're backwards compatible, you're really backwards," and another in an interview with Geoff Keighley that I cannot recall his exact words but it was about the "always on" internet connection: It was something along the lines of no, it doesn't have to be connected at all times, but this is the 21st century so an internet connection is required. He then stated that gamers can now calm down since it doesn't always have to be online. First of all, I REFUSE to buy a system that forces me online (even if it is for just a second) to play single player games. It is ridiculous that this is required just to play a freaking single player game. And what is the point of having physical media (CD, DVD) if it will just be ripped to your hard drive? Microsoft should definitely consider axing these two requirements (I know they won't but I can dream). The last thing I would ax would be that worm Don Mattrick. There have been some jacka**es in the game industry before but he takes the cake. I have been a day one purchaser of both Xbox and the 360 but that will end with the One. I will now purchase the PS4 and WiiU for the Ninty games.
I just don't get how people could be excited to be able to watch tv on your tv on your console. It really isn't that revolutionary outside of doing them seamlessly which I admit is pretty cool but all I really care about are the games and the used games,mandatory install things that make it sound like a terrible system for any consumer,casual or hardcore.